Prim Pontificates- ...but am I really though?
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2025 11:51 pm
So, this discussion/rant/meandering waffle follows on from last week's topic. In fact, last week's topic began as the preamble for this pontification before I figured that it would be easier to split them into two parts.
Last time I talked about how we sometimes describe ourselves as belonging to a certain group or category of gamers, along with the merits and demerits of doing so. The point I was planning to bring up (and then pushed back to this post) is that the way we view ourselves might not always be accurate.
For example, while I do enjoy a wide range of games, I would primarily describe myself as being a Historical Wargamer. I have collections of painted armies covering a span of 2000 years, from Imperial Rome up to the Vietnam War. I have far more painted historical figures than I do for any other genre. I probably have more painted Anglo-Saxons than I do Space Marines from every chapter/legion I play.
However, I cannot recall the last time I played a historical game. I remember running a game of Black Powder for some people at a NagoyaHammer event a few years back, but I probably haven't played it myself since 2018. I've played a couple of games of Bolt Action since Corona, but nothing that justifies having over a dozen armies for it. Admittedly, I have been away from gaming this year, but even last year I mainly played Fantasy or SF games. Zona Alfa was the closest I got to a historical game and even that is an alternate history game. 30K is a historical version of 40K, but it is still an SF game when you get down to it.
So, I keep collecting, building and painting historical minis and never really do anything with them. Am I deluding myself? Am I really a Fantasy Wargamer in denial? At what point do I lose my Historical Gaming membership card? I think it is time for me to start making some decisions and giving more consideration to what I play.
And how about you? When you think about the games you play, how many of them do you truly, actively play and how many sit on a shelf waiting for a day that may never come?
Last time I talked about how we sometimes describe ourselves as belonging to a certain group or category of gamers, along with the merits and demerits of doing so. The point I was planning to bring up (and then pushed back to this post) is that the way we view ourselves might not always be accurate.
For example, while I do enjoy a wide range of games, I would primarily describe myself as being a Historical Wargamer. I have collections of painted armies covering a span of 2000 years, from Imperial Rome up to the Vietnam War. I have far more painted historical figures than I do for any other genre. I probably have more painted Anglo-Saxons than I do Space Marines from every chapter/legion I play.
However, I cannot recall the last time I played a historical game. I remember running a game of Black Powder for some people at a NagoyaHammer event a few years back, but I probably haven't played it myself since 2018. I've played a couple of games of Bolt Action since Corona, but nothing that justifies having over a dozen armies for it. Admittedly, I have been away from gaming this year, but even last year I mainly played Fantasy or SF games. Zona Alfa was the closest I got to a historical game and even that is an alternate history game. 30K is a historical version of 40K, but it is still an SF game when you get down to it.
So, I keep collecting, building and painting historical minis and never really do anything with them. Am I deluding myself? Am I really a Fantasy Wargamer in denial? At what point do I lose my Historical Gaming membership card? I think it is time for me to start making some decisions and giving more consideration to what I play.
And how about you? When you think about the games you play, how many of them do you truly, actively play and how many sit on a shelf waiting for a day that may never come?