NagoyaHammer.com

Might we see a Whedon Star Wars movie?

Interesting, and a wee bit troubling. Monopoly is never a good thing (except perhaps in a caravan on a rainy Sunday afternoon)

Well, whatever they do, it can't really be much worse than Lucas's last efforts.

Agreed - as someone on CMoN pointed out, the significant thing here is not that Disney bought it but that Lucas no longer owns it. Hopefully well have seen the last of abominations like Binks...

me_in_japan wrote:Agreed - as someone on CMoN pointed out, the significant thing here is not that Disney bought it but that Lucas no longer owns it. Hopefully well have seen the last of abominations like Binks...

Or Binks may be the first of many

Primarch wrote:Well, whatever they do, it can't really be much worse than Lucas's last efforts.

Exactly. (Hopefully they won't mess up the Clone Wars cartoon, though. That's actually good.)

Noooooo that's impossible. It can't be. Noooooo.

Well on the bright side they might make a new cool ride at Disneyland next time our wives and betters force us to visit there.

Spevna wrote:Might we see a Whedon Star Wars movie?

And how many shades and flavors of win would that be? Answer- all of them.

While I will not, nor could I, defend the new series, remember the originals were ....campy, stinky, silly things but we didn't notice or care because we were 6 years old. Star Wars is awesome in spite of George Lucas and will do fine without him. Let the man rest and swim in his Olympic sized pool of money. I doubt Disney will screw this up. They have 4 billion dollars invested in it after all.

@ Lucas. You are part of the rebel alliance and a traitor. Take her away.

Incidentally the kansai jigg have been playing a lot of that new X wing game. Looks frickin awesome.
Lets get in on this someone http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/edge_ ... p?eidm=174

You might be right Konrad. How is it we can stomach Wicket but not Binks? Oh that's another thread entirely. Don't answer that anyone.