The Other Dave wrote:Yeah, that's... kinda dumb-looking. Sorry, Mantic.
Their orc boar riders look all right, though.
Well dip my nipples in chocolate and call me Cuthbert!! I do like those boar riders.
The Other Dave wrote:Yeah, that's... kinda dumb-looking. Sorry, Mantic.
Their orc boar riders look all right, though.
Admiral-Badruck wrote:I like the mantic model better
Thats kind of the point. When they copy something from GW (and lets face it, sneaky goblin assassin types are hardly a 'generic' unit, but do happen to be in the new O&G army book that came out just before Mantic's model), they can do an alright job at it. When they have to produce something new from scratch it's kind of lame.Spevna wrote:Me too. I reckon the Mantic one looks even sneakier/nastier.Admiral-Badruck wrote:I like the mantic model better
jus wrote:While I agree with Cuthbert that the mantic goblin looks more sneaky, with his concealed dagger and all. Its also a cleaner model. I like the GW one better, because its more "busy" with detail. He also looks like batman.
Primarch wrote:I've said it before and I will say it again, I would have a lot more respect for Mantic if they weren't literally copying unique units from the GW armybooks.
Mantic: GW: And when they do come up with their own ideas we get Draco-chickens.